Does bush really think the unemployed can get and keep jobs if they were to do away with social secu

and have them invest it?!no they just wouldn%26#039;t have it and the payroll tax if they did not budget it right would dissapear to other people....to the contrary The unemployment rate is still around 4 or 5 or more percent especially with the economy!

Does bush really think the unemployed can get and keep jobs if they were to do away with social security and?heart rate

the unemployement rate is much higher than they say it is bush closes his eyes to this as well as other things all the entry level jobs went to the mexicans he allowed to come over and work for 1/3 of what americans were making

Does bush really think the unemployed can get and keep jobs if they were to do away with social security and? loan

I%26#039;m having trouble getting past the %26quot;bush really think%26quot; part of the question.

All I get is NO at that point.|||Bush is wanting to move all of the Mexicans in and he wants our people to starve and do without jobs. I am not a bush fan at all i regretted the day he became the president because he is only out for himself and the rich.|||Huckabee for president|||Bush doesn%26#039;t care about the unemployed, no one does. They%26#039;re irrelevant to the state of our nation, provided of course their numbers do not swell to unreasonable levels.

They don%26#039;t pay taxes, they don%26#039;t vote, they%26#039;re useless. Bush is more interested in his pro-capitalist agenda and I really can%26#039;t blame him for that.|||Your question is rambling and full of non-sequitors. I will see if I can help anyway.

First the goal of allowing people to invest their own money is to increase investment and increase long run growth. It also has the benefit of offering higher returns than social security. Yes the stock market fluctuates but over the long run it has offered high returns. The best thing about it is that it offers clear accounting; it cannot go into the general fund. It has nothing to do with unemployment.

The current unemployment rate even with the recent increase is actually quite low. VERY LOW when compared to historical averages. Zero unemployment is not a good thing it means that there is no growth in the economy.

While I am no English major your writing is deplorable. A good argument depends on communication. Just a thought|||I don’t quite get your question. First, as the guy above me pointed out, Bush does not think, he’s incapable of thought.

However, insofar as privatizing the SS system, you will be hard pressed to find even ONE low risk mutual fund that couldn’t outperform Social Security. Further, if it were privatized, then congress wouldn’t be able to raid the cash “borrow from it” to pay for their idiotic programs we can’t afford.

Privatized 401(k)’s are very successful and empower the average worker to have control over their retirement destiny. If you go through life blissfully thinking that the government will take care of you in your old age, I’m afraid you’ll be looking forward to a shot-gun shack and cans of Alpo for supper.

The idiots and crooks running this country most certainly do NOT have your best interest at heart.

In 1940 the ratio of workers to retirees drawing social security was 159 : 1

Today the ratio is 3:1

3 people paying in for each person drawing. Soon it will be worst as more and more welfare recipients put their kids on SSI for all the new make believe “disabilities” like A.D.D. and crap.

Its not IF social security goes bankrupt but WHEN. The load is unsustainable – do the math. Then invest in a good Roth IRA or 401(k) or by lots of Alpo.|||Yes I do. Dick said the economony is doing great and so did a fancy graph on fox news. It said the unemployment was 0 so what are you talking about. You can%26#039;t contest me, I don%26#039;t see you with a ranch!!!!