Do you believe George W. Bush when he says Social Security will soon be bankrupt? He says there will not be enough people paying into the system. He says the only way to save Social Security is by privatizing it. He says Americans should invest their Social Security funds in the stock market to prevent a tragedy in the future. I don%26#039;t really understand why he says this. On the one hand, he claims the unemployment rate is extremely low, but on the other hand, he claims that there will not be enough workers in the future to prevent Social Security from becoming bankrupt. What do you think? Do you think something really needs to be done to save Social Security?
Do you believe George W. Bush when he says Social Security is broken?credit repair
Wasn%26#039;t this news in 2003 or something?
Do you believe George W. Bush when he says Social Security is broken? loanThis is why so many people ignore politics. Politicians cause the public to believe there%26#039;s a problem. Then, politicians tell the public that they know how to solve the problem. People send them money to fix the problem, and they take their money. Report It
|||it was broken the day the democrats let LBJ raid it to pay for Vietnam.|||Yes and where in the Constitution does it give the government the authority to force me to participate in a state retirement program?|||Bush is right (see cons I agree with your boy) Social Security is broken. The only thing is his method for fixing the problem differs greatly from mine.|||He does have a point, but it%26#039;s not as dire as he claims.|||It%26#039;s broken if you factor in the 120 Billion a year he needs for his war that lasts forever. That%26#039;s for sure.
Otherwise I bet those books can be juggled.
They relieved Silverado of an equal shortfall without too much difficulty when the Bush boys embezzled that money years ago, didn%26#039;t they?|||Let me make a small point here that is not known by most people. The mathematics that dictates social security will only be able to provide 75% or so of benefits by 2039 is based upon the assumption that the average life expectancy in 2039 will be ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY. That%26#039;s right, that%26#039;s ONE FIVE ZERO.
Beyond laughable, huh?|||As the baby boomers retire there are not enough people to support them - doesn%26#039;t matter who the president is. The baby boomers would have had to give birth to 3 children for each of them - that is six children per family to support the current system.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_boomer
http://www.socialsecurity.org/pubs/artic...|||Yes.
Why don%26#039;t you understand it?
It%26#039;s quite simple.
Bush tried to save it, and the Democrats stopped him.
DEMOCRATS CAN NOT ALLOW FOR SOCIAL SECURITY TO BE IN GOOD SHAPE.
(Don%26#039;t feel bad. When I was your age, I didn%26#039;t know anything from squat.)|||Yes - if it was solvent he would have raided it to pay for the war.|||I believe Bush is a puppet for the owners of the Federal Reserve just like Hillary will be when she is elected by the parrots we call voters.
Social Security is a farce for starters. It was never meant as a retirement program but since 1969 Congress has been stealing (they call it borrowing) money from the SS Trust Fund to pay for pork projects without having to constantly raise taxes (which makes it easier to get reelected) and they haven%26#039;t been paying back the Trust Fund like they said they would - yes, Republicans and Democrats are responsible for bankrupting Social Security but millions of Americans are still naive enough to vote for them.|||I don%26#039;t believe it because Bush said it.
I believe it because every independent analysis for the past decade (at least) has also said it.|||No.
Use common sense.
Tens of millions pay into social security every day in this country. Social security taxes are at an all time high. Plus, billions of dollars were paid into the system by illegals over the past several years. Those monies were and still are put into a special fund that Bush nor Congress ever talk about to you, the general public.
Additionally, your government has been dipping into social security funds for decades. They will never pay back what they borrowed. Hence the broken%26quot; bs.
I don%26#039;t buy this %26#039;people are living longer than they used to ;and they collect longer%26quot;--- well so what! They earned it!
If Bush wants to do something to %26#039;fix%26#039; the system, then let him throw a piece of legislation to Congress....do like he did when he wanted those hundreds of billions for Iraq. Do the same thing for the Social Security system. Pay back every cent that was borrowed -- with interest.
Then it would be %26#039;fixed%26#039;.
Besides I don%26#039;t believe a word Bush says anymore, or perhaps I should say, a %26quot;word%26quot; others tell him to say.He is so untrustworthy that there is no reason to believe him, about this issue, or any other.
bye bye bush
Bush%26#039; only interest in fixing the ss system it to help his investor buddies on Wall Street.He can fool others but not this young woman.
DEANNA
below
%26#039;You are absolutely
categorically correct!
Illegals HAVE been paying in to social security for decades!
There was NO accounting regarding their earnings!
Yes they used others social security numbers.
humm
So all that did was to fatten the coffers of those whose social secrity numbers were used?
You forget. Social security goes by numbers NOT names.
So some of you oldsters there are actually collecting off of the benefits of that 185 billion YOUR govenrment Never told you about which was contributed by ILLEGALS who will never see a dime of it.
Stop being foolish sillies.
Check out what your government DOES NOT tell you.|||I would say it isn%26#039;t broken, but does need some attention. The first thing to do would be to quit allowing congress to get their sticky fingers on it. There are many other things that I think should be done to bolster it, but I won%26#039;t go into all of them here.|||Yes. But I believed that long before President Bush said it.
My retirement financial planning never includes income input from Social Security. I don%26#039;t believe it will be there when I%26#039;m eligible to retire.|||yep!|||Yes, it%26#039;s been broken for years %26amp; a part of the national debt. Unfortunately the issue reaches all the way back to its inception. Originally it was marketed as a a savings benefit %26amp; many of the people who bought into it mistakenly believed that all of the $ they put into it would be theirs at retirement - much like a savings acct. Part of the problems with it are allowing immigrants who are in the country %26amp; barely work for a year to retire with benefits, congress borrowing from it to fund other programs, and many people who collect it upon becoming disabled %26amp; then staying on it for decades. It needs to be majorly revamped since it is as much of a problem as ADC %26amp; welfare used to be.|||the Social Security system is absolutely on the road to collapse. Too many retirees and not enough new workers entering the system. On the other hand, privatizing Social Security would be a terrible mistake... I haven%26#039;t heard the other options and the elderly voters will never support taking down Social Security, so look forward to a long, harsh collapse of the Social Security system|||No, don%26#039;t beleive it because I heard something the other day when a lady was talking about illeagal immigrants and how so many actually pay into the SS fund but never collect...In fact it is really a savings account for everyone who works unless they ask to not pay!! So the insurance like Social security is paid in and that total decides your monthly payment when and if you retire. So What the woman said in passing was that there is $185 Billion dollars being held(untouchable) for recipients who will never collect for whatever reasons...so I think there was a greed factor that no one will talk about in that whole issue...that money would have disappeared into the ???warchest? or who ever could get it first because it is a secret little fund....If the SS was dismantled then where would it go?? Now as for new duties on the backs of those few SS employees...the new duty is not legal really but yours truly, Mr Bush wants the SS number for any questionable employee to be researced out to prove that person was leagal to work in the US...The employers would be required to fire them...I have to go now...|||Social Security is going broke but a) Bush has no real intention to fix it and b) Bush isn%26#039;t the first one to mention it.
Lets address some of the key issues in your question:
%26quot;Americans should invest their Social Security funds in the stock market to prevent a tragedy in the future%26quot;
This carries obvious risk, but we%26#039;ve also seen that the Federal Reserve is willing to create inflation to keep stock profits up. These types of currency devaluation policies would hurt the lower half of the income spectrum a lot less if they had some money in the market, too. Every worker earning less than $90 K a year is already %26quot;investing%26quot; 13% of their wage toward retirement, unfortunately our politicians are spending it faster than it comes in. After 70 years of %26quot;saving%26quot; for social security, we have a big I Owe You saved up and not one penny more. The worst that could happen? The stock market loses all value and we break even compared to the government%26#039;s investment plan.
%26quot;he claims the unemployment rate is extremely low, but on the other hand, he claims that there will not be enough workers in the future to prevent Social Security from becoming bankrupt%26quot;
Believe it or not, these are both correct! Unemployment calculates the number of people who WANT a job but cannot find one. For this statistic, our current rates are low. This just means if you WANT a job, you have good odds of finding one.
On the other hand! Last year, only some 120,000,000 income tax returns were filed. More people than ever simply don%26#039;t have to work because of government benefits, retirement, disability, whatever. When social security was started, there were 15 workers for every beneficiary. Today that number is closer to 2 workers for every beneficiary. Birth rates are in drastic decline and people are living longer than ever before, so this trend is going to continue.
Here are the real options:
-More Money In-
A) Private investment - try to beat the government%26#039;s rate of return
B) Raise Social Security Taxes
-Cut Costs-
C) Reduce Social Security benefits
D) Raise the Age of Retirment
-Increase the working population-
E) Ban abortion and birth control so we have more population at work
F) Let virtually unlimited amounts of immigrants in
G) Cut welfare benefits etc to force more people to pay taxes
-Save for your own retirement, ignoring the 13% of your income that was supposedly for your retirement, because if you%26#039;re under 40 it probably won%26#039;t be there for you when you retire if no reforms are made-
H) None of the above|||If the 1.8 trillion dollars the federal government owes the trust fund was in place there would be no problem. Instead of cash the fund consists of nonnegotiable government bonds that are basically worthless because the government has no intention of paying it back. When I borrow money I have to pay it back. Maybe that is what we should do something about. That and keep their sticky fingers out of the fund in the future.
